Weightology Research Review October 2020

The October 2020 issue of the Weightology Research Review is now online!

Does incline bench really target upper pecs? Are bodybuilders weak? Why do some people claim there's a metabolic advantage to low carb? Can cyclical keto diets combine the best of both worlds? Is cardio or weight training better for getting ripped abs? Can cold exposure get you shredded? We've got the answers to these questions and more in this issue.

Here's the table of contents for this issue.

  • Flat vs. Incline Bench for Chest: Were the Bros Wrong?
  • Are Bodybuilders' Muscles Weak For Their Size?
  • Compensatory Theory & Obesity Relapse: Incomplete Model, or Incomplete Analysis?
  • Creatine: Swelling to Swoleness
  • Cardio vs. Resistance Training for Ab Fat
  • Get Cold to Burn Fat?
  • The Low Carb Lie
  • Cyclical Keto Diets for Fat Loss

Whether you're trying to build muscle, lose fat, compete in physique shows, or help your clients lose weight and get fit, there's something in this issue for everyone.⁠

Subscribers get reviews of 8 different studies each month in web, mobile-optimized PDF, and digital magazine PDF versions, and access to an archive of 300+ video and written research reviews, evidence-based guides, and Q&As.⁠

Want to see more? Click here to subscribe!

Want to see some example content? Click here!

Already a member? Log in here.


Get the latest science on muscle gain and fat loss every month

Keeping up with the research is tough, so let me do the work for you. Consider signing up for the Weightology Research Review. I cover 8 studies per month and break everything down for you, so you don't need a PhD to interpret the data. You also get access to an archive of nearly 300 video and written reviews, evidence-based guides, Q&A's, and more. Click here to learn more.

Want some sample content before you buy?

Get Instant Access to Free Research Reviews!

 
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x