Insulin…an Undeserved Bad Reputation


Get the latest science on muscle gain and fat loss every month

Keeping up with the research is tough, so let us do the work for you. Consider signing up for Research Explained in Practical Summaries (REPS). We cover five studies per month and break everything down for you, so you don't need a PhD to interpret the data. Click here to learn more.

Get access to over seven years of past research reviews, video content, and Q&As on training and nutrition

Get access to the Weightology Archives of over 400 video and written research reviews, evidence-based guides, and Q&As. A total of 7.5 years of content! A huge variety of topics related to muscle building, fat loss, nutrition, and fitness are covered. Click here to obtain lifetime access.  
4.3 10 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
291 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback

[…] Insulin an undeserved bad reputation (Part I of the series):https://weightology.net/insulin-an-undeserved-bad-reputation/ […]

Nogger Bör
Nogger Bör
2 years ago

so so nice i can only empfählen

trackback

[…] lean. Huh? The critics were getting louder, so I read James Krieger’s multi-part series on Insulin: An Undeserved Bad Reputation. It was his analogy that insulin is like a traffic cop that clicked with […]

trackback

[…] I am neutral on sugar, I think this fear is likely overstated. Regarding insulin, I suspect Krieger is right, not […]

PVF
PVF
5 years ago

tHANKS FOR SHARING THIS PERSPECTIVE!

Dominick Cioffi
Dominick Cioffi
6 years ago

In the article above, you mention: “you would eat a low protein, low carbohydrate, high fat diet. However, I don’t see anybody recommending that.” Isn’t that the KETO Diet? When was this article written?

Dr. Erik Rohleder
Dr. Erik Rohleder
5 years ago
Reply to  James Krieger

Right, it’s moderate to low protein, doesn’t make much of a difference though.

Last edited 5 years ago by Dr. Erik Rohleder
FitMastoid
6 years ago

Thanks a lot, it’s a very significiant article.

Carolina Morgenstein
7 years ago

With thanks! Valuable information!

Sarah
Sarah
8 years ago

That blue/green graph is not accurate in the least. It does not take Glycogen into account. If you’re eating foods which result in insulting spikes, you’re constantly re-filling your Glycogen stores. Thus, in between meals and during sleep you’d be burning STORED CARBS (Glycogen) for the most part, NOT FAT. I feel that Glycogen is forgotten about. Similarly, when people are eating carbs and working out thinking they are burning fat. Well, first you’re burning the carbs, then Glycogen THEN fat. So, why not just cut the carbs, thus depleting the glycogen stores and go straight to burning fat for… Read more »

blah
blah
8 years ago
Reply to  Sarah

No it is accurate, your body stores glycogen in muscles and the liver, however, only the liver glycogen is responsible for balancing out your blood sugar (burned when blood sugar is low). The glycogen in the muscles will not be used, unless if you use the muscle. Even then, you will not burn all the glycogen in your liver all at once. Your liver only stores about 400 cal worth of glycogen, and studies has shown that if you fast, you’ll still have liver glycogen left after 48 hours. On average a person will burn at least 80 cal each… Read more »

1 11 12 13
291
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x